IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management
issue front

Geeta Rana1 and Ravindra Sharma1

First Published 21 May 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijim.251335501
Article Information
Corresponding Author:

Geeta Rana, Himalayan School of Management Studies, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jolly Grant, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248016, India.
Email: geetarana@srhu.edu.in

1Himalayan School of Management Studies, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

cc img

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed. 

Abstract

This article follows events faced by Nisha Verma, a talented employee at Lotus Beauty Care Pvt Ltd, Haridwar. While Nisha’s consistently good performance was acknowledged by even her superiors, she was shocked to receive a poor performance appraisal in 2018. While she tried to talk to her superiors to know the reason for such a poor appraisal, she got no clear answer. This case study examines the event and seeks to determine whether: (a) Nisha really received the appraisal she deserved?, (b) it was a case of poor employee performance management on the part of Lotus? or (c) it was a deliberate ploy by Lotus to oust Nisha so that they could hire someone else for a lower salary?

This article aims to:

  1. Analyse the performance appraisal method used to assess the performance of Nisha Verma.
  2. Examine the basis on which Nisha Verma was given a poor performance appraisal.
  3. Analyse Nisha’s performance appraisal and the events that followed
  4. Debate whether the issue was just a case of wrongly (or otherwise) performed performance appraisal, or a deliberate attempt by Lotus to oust Nisha in order to hire someone else at a lower salary.
Keywords

Performance management, talent retention, attrition, grading, key performance indicators

References

Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2004). Managing performance: Performance management in action. CIPD.

Bhattacharjee, S., & Sengupta, S. (2011). A study of performance management system in a corporate firm. VSRD-IJBMR, 1(8), 496–513.

Campion, M. A., Fink, B., Ruggeberg, L., Carr, G., Phillips, & R. Odman. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(8), 225–262.

Clausen, T. (2008). Appraising employee performance evaluation systems. CPA Journal, 78(4), 64–78.

Drucker, P. E. (1954). The practice of management. Harper & Brothers.

Helm, C., Holladay, C. L., & Tortorella, F. R. (2007). The performance management system: Applying and evaluating a pay-for-performance initiative. Journal of Healthcare Management, 52(1), 49–63.

Holloway, J., Lewis, J., & Mallory, G. (Eds). (1995). Performance measurement and evaluation. Sage Publications.

Jain, S., & Gautam, A. (2014). Performance management system: A strategic tool for human resource management. Prabandhan Guru, 5(2), 28–32.

Rana, G. (2014). Performance appraisal powers growth at Havell’s India: Company identifies and invests in talented people early. Human Resource Management International Digest, 22(5), 8–10.

Roberts, G. E. (2003). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 32, 89–98.

Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy: Text & cases. Prentice Hall.

Wadhwa, S., & Wadhwa, P. (2011). A study of 360-degree appraisal and feedback system for effective implementation in Indian corporate sector. VSRD International Journal of Business & Management Research, 1(4), 205–216.

Watkins, R. (2007). Designing for performance. Part 3: Design, develop, and improve. Performance Improvement, 46(4), 42–48.


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy