This study explores the complex relationships between the accessibility of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in rural Haryana and user satisfaction with public services. The study explores how ‘easiness’ mediates the relationship between accessibility and satisfaction, putting forth a complex model of moderated mediation in which amenities play a key moderating role. Using a large dataset of 981 respondents, the study makes use of several advanced statistical techniques. The results show that there is a significant mediation impact of ease of use in the link between accessibility and satisfaction. Additionally, the study reveals that amenities have a moderating effect on this association, influencing its nature and degree of strength. Remarkably, the ease of use mediates the indirect effect of accessibility on satisfaction, which is strongest in areas with a lot of good or high-quality amenities. All things considered, this study makes a substantial contribution to our understanding of the complex interactions between accessibility, ease of use, conveniences and user satisfaction when it comes to ICT-based public service delivery in rural regions. The information gathered has important policy implications since it highlights how facilities and technology accessibility play a crucial role in increasing user satisfaction in rural development programs.

Accessibility, easiness, satisfaction, amenities, moderated-mediation

Alam, M., & Zafar, M. (2017). E-government services in rural areas: A case study of Pakistan. Journal of Global Information Management, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10471239.2017.1275607

Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H., & Batiha, K. (2013). Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government information quarterly, 30(3), 277–288.

Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1995). The survey research handbook: Guidelines and strategies for conducting a survey (Ed. 3, pp. 1–496). IRWIN Professional Publishing.

Alshira’H, M. H. (2020). The effects of usability and accessibility for e-government services on the end-user satisfaction. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM),, 14(13), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i13.14659

Aminu, I. M., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2014). Strategic orientation, access to finance, business environment and SMEs performance in Nigeria: Data screening and preliminary analysis. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(35), 124–132.

Assaker, G., Hallak, R., Assaf, A. G., & Assad, T. (2015). Validating a structural model of destination image, satisfaction, and loyalty across gender and age: Multigroup analysis with PLS-SEM. Tourism Analysis, 20(6), 577–591.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems, 32(2), 201–214.

Biswas,  C., Omar, H., & Rashid-Radha, J. Z. R. R. (2020). The impact of tourist attractions and accessibility on tourists' satisfaction: The moderating role of tourists' age. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 32(4), 1202–1208.

Bruske, E. (2013). Arundel clinic survives brush with bankruptcy. Rural Health News, 29(1), 1–2.

Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). The influence of perceived characteristics of innovating on e-Government adoption. Electronic Journal of E-government, 2(1), 11–20.

Chigona, W., & Ndlovu, S. (2014). Evaluating the accessibility of e-government services in rural areas of South Africa. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 584–596. https://doi.org/1016/j.giq.2014.06.008

Datta, S. K., & Roy, P. K. (2016). Accessibility of e-government services in rural India: A study of West Bengal. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(13), 1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1089495

Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002). Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validating e-commerce metrics. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 316–333.

Dua, A. (2023). Review of adoption theories in the context of blockchain. IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management, 1(1), 46–57.

Eslami, M. R., & Asadi, M. H. (2018). The role of ICT in rural development: A case study of Iran. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 403–423. DOI:10.1080/02681102.2017.1372171

Fang, Z. (2002). E-government in digital era: concept, practice, and development. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 10(2), 1–22.

Fraser, C., & Sudbury, R. (2014). The impact of e-government on rural communities: A literature review. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.003

Furuholt, B., & Sæbø, Ø. (2018). The role telecentres play in providing e-government services in rural areas: A longitudinal study of Internet access and e-government services in Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(1), e12006.

Geyskens, I., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2000). Economic and social satisfaction: measurement and relevance to marketing channel relationships. Journal of Retailing, 76(1), 11–32.

Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Kumar, N. (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 223–238.

Guerrero, S., & Barraud-Didier, V. (2004). High-involvement practices and performance of French firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(8), 1408–1423.

Gupta, A., & Sharma, R. K. (2015). E-government in rural India: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 35(6), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.05.002

Hair, J. R., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford.

Huang, S., Weiler, B., & Assaker, G. (2015). Effects of interpretive guiding outcomes on tourist satisfaction and behavioral intention. Journal of Travel Research, 54(3), 344–358.

Hung, S.-Y., & Chen, Y.-S. (2016). Factors affecting the adoption of e-government services in rural areas: A case study of Taiwan. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.002

Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323–331.

Jha, S. K., & Sahoo, J. (2017). E-government services in rural areas: A case study of India. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.004

Karim, M. A. (2003). Technology and improved service delivery: Learning points from the Malaysian experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(2), 191–204.

Kim, J., Park, J., & Ahn, J. (2018). The mediating role of easiness in the relationship between accessibility and satisfaction in online shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 59–68.

Kindel, K., Ritso, V., & Venesaar, U. (2014). Business satisfaction with E-government services in Baltic Sea region. In DB&IS (pp. 217–230). IOS Press.

Krishnan, K. R., Sahay, S., & Teo, T. S. H. (2004). Adoption of e-government services by citizens: A study of Indian citizens. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035142

Latif, A., & Bashir, Y. (2013). Evaluating the accessibility of e-government services in rural areas of Pakistan. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.003

Lee, S. M., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). The effects of e-government use on rural residents' quality of life. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 531–540.

Liao, C.-H., & Chen, C.-C. (2015). The role of ICT in rural development in Taiwan: A case study of the e-government initiative. Information Technology for Development, 21(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2014.944049

Liu, Y., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2017). The mediating role of easiness in the relationship between accessibility and satisfaction in public transportation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 99, 1–13.

Miles, J. (2014). Tolerance and variance inflation factor. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.

Nair, P. K., & Thomas, J. (2018). Impact of e-governance on rural development: A case study of Kerala, India. International Journal of Information Management, 38(4), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.003

Ngulube, P. (2007). The nature and accessibility of e-government in Sub Saharan Africa. The International Review of Information Ethics, 7, 155–167.

Okafor, E. U., & Okoye, B. N. (2017). Determinants of e-government adoption in rural areas: Evidence from Nigeria. Information Development, 33(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916676491

Parikh, K., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). E-governance services in rural India: Evaluation of citizen's satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.005

Prakash, A. S., Gupta, A. K., & Kaur, S. (2023). Economic aspect of implementing green HR practices for environmental sustainability. IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management, 1(1), 94–106.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

Rai, A., & Sahay, S. (2005). E-government in developing countries: Adoption, diffusion and impact. Information Technology for Development, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.2001

Raju, R., & Rao, V. (2017). E-government services and rural development: A study of India. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.003

Saxena, K., & Kumar, A. (2018). E-government adoption in rural India: A study of the role of individual and institutional factors. International Journal of Information Management, 38(5), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.006

Sharma, R., Mishra, N., & Sharma, G. (2023). India’s frugal innovations: Jugaad and unconventional innovation strategies. IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management, 1(1) 25–45.

Singh, A., & Kumar, A. (2017). Accessibility and adoption of e-government services in rural India: A study of the role of individual and institutional factors. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.002

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168