IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management
issue front

Merliyn Anna Thomas1 and Jyothis T.1

First Published 14 Nov 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijim.241288031
Article Information Volume 3, Issue 1 January 2025
Corresponding Author:

Merliyn Anna Thomas, Department of Commerce, St. Thomas College, Kozhencherry, Kerala 689672, India
Email: merliynannathomas2021r@stthomascollege.info

Department of Commerce, St. Thomas College, Kozhencherry, Kerala, India

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed. 

Abstract

In recent years, digital nudging, which is based on human-computer interaction and behavioural economics, has received much attention as a means to influence users' behaviour in digital environments. There has been a notable proliferation of scholarly investigations within diverse academic disciplines related to the concept of digital nudge and its implementation in real-life contexts. However, there remains a significant gap in the comprehensive understanding of the current state of research on digital nudging and its future directions. This article offers an extensive bibliometric analysis of the digital nudging literature by examining 1,713 publications sourced from the Scopus database, covering the period from 2008 to mid-2023. This study outlines trends in digital nudging publications, identifies the most pertinent sources and highlights frequently used keywords. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer was subsequently performed to uncover thematic clusters. The co-authorship network analysis of authors and countries, the co-occurrence of specific keywords and author-level co-citation analysis reveal notable patterns and themes within the field of digital nudging. This study serves as a valuable resource for gaining a comprehensive understanding of recent research developments in digital nudging.

Keywords

Digital nudge, choice architecture, bibliometric analysis, Scopus, VOSviewer

References

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Cote, G., & Karimi, R., (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386.

Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2008). Judgment in managerial decision making. Wiley.

Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235.

Constantiou, I., Lehrer, C., & Hess, T. (2014). Changing information retrieval behaviours: An empirical investigation of users' cognitive processes in the choice of location-based services. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(5), 513–528.

Eigenbrod, L., & Janson, A. (2018). How digital nudges influence consumers- Experimental investigation in the context of retargeting.

Hansen, P. G. (2016). The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: Does the hand fit the glove? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1), 155–174.

Huang, N., Chen, P. Y., Hong, Y., & Wu, S. Y. (2018). Digital nudging for online social sharing: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1483–1491. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.185

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.

Kesseli, S. (2021). Detecting the effect of digital nudges on customer response in e-commerce environment (Doctoral dissertation). Aalto University.

Koch, C. (2020). Effect differences of digital nudging along the customer journey- A field experiment effect differences of differences of digital nudging along the customer  (pp. 59–69). AMA Accademic Summer Conference 2020. https://www.researchgate.net/publication

Marx, J., & Germies, J. (2021). Conscious commerce – Digital nudging and sustainable E-commerce purchase decisions. 1–11.

Meske, C., Amojo, I., & Mohr, P. (2020). Digital nudging to increase usage of charity features on e-commerce platforms digital nudging to increase usage of charity features on e-commerce platforms. March. https://doi.org/10.30844/wi

Rani, A., & Salanke, P. (2023). A bibliometric analysis on business and management research during COVID-19 pandemic: trends and prospects. IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijim.221148834

Schär, A. (2023). Pre-purchase nudging: Digital nudging efficacy in the pre- purchase stage of the customer journey (Doctoral dissertation). https://www.e-helvetica.nb.admin.ch/

Sharma, K., & Cheng, M. X. (2021). Impact of digital nudging on information security behavior?: An experimental study on framing and priming in cybersecurity. 1(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/OCJ-03-2021-0009

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665.

Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin Books.

Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., & Balz, J. P. (2013). Choice architecture. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundation of policy (pp. 428–439). Princeton University Press.

Thaler, R. H., Benartzi, S., Sunstein, C. R., & Gennaioli, N. (2013). Beware of defaults. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 47–58. doi:10.1257/jep.27.3.47.

Tomar, S. S. (2023). Factors affecting customer satisfaction in online grocery shopping?: An empirical analysis. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijim.231206620

Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., & Brocke, J. vom. (2016). Digital nudging. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 58(6), 433–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-016-0453-1.

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organisational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy