In the professional degree, understanding the concepts is important, along with their applications in the real world. Students should have hands-on experience during their study at the university to solve real-world problems effectively in their professional careers. The practical examination to test students’ lab skills is one of the assessment methods. In the engineering programme, instructors conduct the practical examination in different courses in either open-book or closed-book mode at Ahmedabad university. To find out the students’ perspective on the effectiveness of an open-book practical examination, the study was carried out to answer the following hypotheses: Should there be a practical exam? Is it easy to score in the open-book practical exam? Does practical knowledge help to solve real-life problems? And is an open-book practical exam as effective as a closed-book exam? For the study, a questionnaire was circulated through Google Forms to the undergraduate students. Both quantitative and qualitative responses were recorded through questionnaires and interviews. Students enrolled in the different courses of engineering responded to the questionnaire and answered the questions in person. The analysis of the student survey was done using the chi-square method. From the p value, it was concluded that the null hypotheses were rejected, which proved that open-book practical exams are better. As per the students’ perspective, open-book practical exams are as difficult as closed-book exams. It is not easy to score in the open-book practical exam without understanding the concepts, even though the syntaxes and resources are available.

Education, higher education, assessment, examination, open-book examination

Ashri, D., & Sahoo, B. P. (2021). Open book examination and higher education during COVID-19: Case of university of Delhi. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(1), 73–86.

Block, R. M. (2012). A discussion of the effect of open-book and closed-book exams on student achievement in an introductory statistics course. PRIMUS, 22(3), 228–238.

Brightwell, D. R., Daniel, J. H., & Stewart, D. A. (2004). Evaluation: Is an open book examination easier? Bioscience Education, 3(1), 1–10.

Feldhusen, J. F. (1961). An evaluation of college students’ reactions to open book examinations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 21(3), 637–646.

Johanns, B., Dinkens, A., & Moore, J. A. (2017). Systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 27, 89–94.

Naik, S. (2014). Concepts of database management systems (BCA). Pearson Education.

Naik, S., & Gajjar, K. (2023). Applying and evaluating engagement and application-based learning and education (enable): A student-centered learning pedagogy for the course database management system. Journal of Education, 203(2), 410–422.

Naik, S. T., & Purohit, J. A. (2023). Effectiveness of e-crossword puzzle tool in the multidisciplinary course for the undergraduate students [Paper presentation]. The 16th Annual ACM India Compute Conference (pp. 37–42).

Theophilides, C., & Koutselini, M. (2000). Study behavior in the closed-book and the open-book examination: A comparative analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(4), 379–393.

Williams, J. B., & Wong, A. (2009). The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 227–236.

Zaguryorly, I., & Durning, S. J. (2021). Assessing open-book examination in medical education: The time is now. Medical Teacher, 4(3), 972–973.