IMIB Journal of Innovation and Management
issue front

Vidhya Satish1, Arshia Kaul2 and Vasundhara Kaul2

First Published 20 Dec 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/ijim.231205659
Article Information Volume 2, Issue 1 January 2024
Corresponding Author:

Arshia Kaul, Carpediem EdPsych Consultancy LLP, Ajmera Treon, Bhakti Park, Wadala(E), Mumbai, Maharashtra 400037, India.
Email: arshia.kaul@gmail.com

SIES Institute of Comprehensive Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Carpediem EdPsych Consultancy LLP, Ajmera Treon, Bhakti Park, Wadala(E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.

Abstract

We are living in an ever-changing world. The changes in science, technology and economics constantly impact areas closely related to human life, such as education and health. Organisations must rely on innovation to remain relevant and effective in a constantly evolving society. Educational institutions, namely schools, colleges or even training institutions, contribute to product innovation when they produce new and significantly different products and services such as new syllabi, new resources or new educational experiences like e-learning. They carry out process innovation when they bring about significant changes in how they provide their service, for instance, changes in the way their teachers work together, communicate with parents or offer services in collaboration with other institutions. With the onset of the medical catastrophe of COVID-19 and the pandemic thereafter, the education sector plunged itself into adapting to the use of technology to keep its service functional, albeit with significant challenges faced in its effective implementation. In this article, the focus is on studying technology implementation in an early childhood care teacher-training institute to establish service innovation in education in the post-pandemic era. Multiple perspectives were derived from all the stakeholders, such as student-teachers, teacher educators and heads of schools (as future employers) regarding teacher preparedness and student-teacher readiness. The inputs helped us to develop the conceptual model for future teaching-learning. The conceptual model A.D.O.P.T. (Act with growth mindset, Deliver Quality, Open to Adaptation, Prioritize with Precision, Team Engagement) highlights how the stakeholders move from makeshift ‘jugaad’ innovation to sustainable development of the educational system through grassroots innovation.

Keywords

Service, innovation, hybrid learning, teacher training institute, early childhood care

References

Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.

Aperribai, L., Cortabarria, L., Aguirre, T., Verche, E., & Borges, Á. (2020). Teacher’s physical activity and mental health during lockdown due to the COVID-2019 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2673. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2020.577886

Arnett, T., & Moesta, B. (2021). The K-12 improvement imperative: Pathways to adopting continuous improvement. Clayton Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED614142

Ashton, D., & Green, F. (1996). Education, training and the global economy. Edward Elgar.

Audretsch, D.B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321.

Azorín, C. (2020). Beyond COVID-19 supernova. Is another education coming? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 381–390. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/-2056-9548#earlycite

Basri, F. (2023). Factors influencing learner autonomy and autonomy support in a faculty of education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 270–285.

Bessant, J., & Caffyn, S. (1997). High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1), 7–28.

Bhuiyan, N., & Baghel, A. (2005). An overview of continuous improvement: From the past to the present. Management Decision, 43(5), 761–771.

Boals, A., & Banks, J.B. (2020). Stress and cognitive functioning during a pandemic: Thoughts from stress researchers. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12(S1), S255–S257. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000716

Boettcher, J.V., & Conrad, R.M. (2021). The online teaching survival guide: Simple and practical pedagogical tips. John Wiley & Sons.

Brem, A., & Wolfram, P. (2014). Research and development from the bottom up-introduction of terminologies for new product development in emerging markets. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 1–22.

Bryk, A.S., Gomez, L.M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P.G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Budhai, S.S. (2021). Best practices in engaging online learners through active and experiential learning strategies. Routledge.

Carter, N.M., Gartner, W.B., & Reynolds, P.D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 151–166.

Clark, B.R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Pergamon-Elsevier Science.

Cooper, A.C., Gimeno-Gascon, F.J., & Woo, C.Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395.

Darby, F., & Lang, J.M. (2019). Small teaching online: Applying learning science in online classes. Jossey-Bass.

David, B.E., & Kumar, S. (2020). Psychological health problems during the lockdown: A survey of Indian population in COVID-19 pandemic. Data in Brief, 33, 106566.

Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Derrick-Mills, T., Sandstrom, H., Pettijohn, S., Fyffe, S., & Koulish, J. (2014). Data use for continuous quality improvement: What the Head Start field can learn from other disciplines, a literature review and conceptual framework [OPRE report, No. 2014–77]. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crises. Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003a). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003b). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.

Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information, 52(3), 486–511.

Goldstein, H.A. (2010). The ‘entrepreneurial turn’ and regional economic development mission of universities. Annals of Regional Science, 44(1), 83–109.

Feldman, J. (2018). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hagerty, S.L., & Williams, L.M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on mental health: The interactive roles of brain biotypes and human connection. Brain, Behavior, & Immunity-Health, 5, 100078.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers’ work. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039

Harvard Business School Press. (2007). Straight talk from the world’s top business leaders: Managing change. Harvard Business School Press.

Harvard Business School Press. (2009). Straight talk from the world’s top business leaders: Crisis as opportunity. Harvard Business School Press.

Harvard Business School Press. (2013). On innovation. Harvard Business School Press.

Harvard Business School Press. (2020). Coronavirus: leadership + recovery. Harvard Business School Press.

Harvard Business School Press. (2021). On leading digital transformation. Harvard Business School Press.

Hawley, W.D. (2006). The keys to effective schools: Educational reform as continuous improvement. Corwin Press.

Katowa-Mukwato, P., Mwiinga-Kalusopa, V., Chitundu, K., Kanyanta, M., Chanda, D., Mwelwa, M.M., Wahila, R., Petronella, M. & Carrier, J. (2021). Implementing evidence based practice nursing using the PDSA model: Process, lessons and implications. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 14, 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100261

Katz, S., Earl, L.M., & Jaafar, S.B. (2009). Building and connecting learning communities: The power of networks for school improvement. Corwin Press.

Krishna, V.V., & Krishna, U. (2005). ‘South Asia’, in UNESCO science report. UNESCO.

Kuensel. (2020, March 6). First confirmed coronavirus case in Bhutan. Kuensel. https://kuenselonline.com/first-confirmed-coronavirus-case-in-bhutan/

Langley, G., Moen, R., Nolan, K., Nolan, T., & Norman, C. (2009). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Lorentzen, J. (2009). Learning and innovation: What’s different in the (sub) tropics and how do we explain it? A review essay. Science, Technology and Society, 14(1), 177–205.

Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E.J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2006). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.470.5465&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Nancy, W., Parimala, A., & Livingston, L.M. (2020). Advanced teaching pedagogy as innovative approach in modern education system. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.059

Narasimharao, B.P. (2009). Knowledge economy and knowledge society—Role of university outreach programmes in India. Science, Technology and Society, 14(1), 119–151.

Netolicky, D.M. (2020). School leadership during a pandemic: Navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 391–395. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/2056-9548#earlycite

Nowakowska, M., B?ben, K., & Paj?cki, M. (2020). Use of data mining in a two-step process of profiling student preferences in relation to the enhancement of English as a foreign language teaching. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, 13(5), 482–498.

Park, S., Hironaka, S., Carver, P., & Nordstrum, L. (2013). Continuous improvement in education. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/carnegie-foundation_continuous-improvement_2013.05.pdf.

Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141.

Prabhu, J. (2017). Frugal innovation: Doing more with less for more. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 1–22. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2016.0372

Prabhu, J., & Jain, S. (2015). Innovation and entrepreneurship in India: Understanding jugaad. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(4), 843–868.

OECD. (2005). Oslo manual (3rd ed.). OECD.

OECD. (2014). Measuring innovation in education. OECD.

O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009.

Rathod, S., Pallikadavath, S., Young, A.H., Graves, L., Rahman, M.M., Brooks, A., Soomro, M., Rathod, P., & Phiri, P. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Protocol and results of first three weeks from an international cross-section survey-focus on health professionals. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2020.100005

Redinger, J.W., Cornia, P.B., & Albert, T.J. (2020). Teaching during a pandemic. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 12(4), 403–405.

Ridley, M. (2020). How innovation works: And why it flourishes in freedom. Harper.

Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). Free Press of Glencoe.

Rogers, E.M. (2003a). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press.

Rogers, E.M. (2003b). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press (Kindle Edition).

Sardana, D., & Krishna, V.V. (2006). Government, university and industry relations: The case of biotechnology in the Delhi region. Science, Technology and Society, 11(2), 351–378.

Selvaraj, A., Radhin, V., Nithin, K.A., Benson, N., & Mathew, A.J. (2021). Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33.

Shapiro, H., Haahr, J.H., Bayer, I., & Boekholt, P. (2007). Background paper on innovation and education. Danish Technological Institute and Technopolis for the European Commission, DG Education & Culture in the context of a planned Green Paper on innovation.

Shea,  P., Pickett, A., & Li, C.S. (2005). Increasing access to higher education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v6i2.238

Sidorkin, A.M., & Warford, M.K. (2017). Reforms and innovation in education. Springer.

Sintema, E.J. (2020, April 7). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. URASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893

Smirnov, I. (2017). Identifying factors associated with the survival and success of grassroots educational innovations. In A. M. Sidorkin & Warford M. K. (Eds.), Reforms and innovation in education (pp. 85–98). Springer, Cham.

Snow, J., Dismuke, S., Zenkert, A.J., & Loffer, C. (2017). Re-culturing educator preparation programs: A collaborative case study of continuous improvement. The Teacher Educator, 52(4), 308–325.

Soffer, T., Nachmias, R., & Ram, J. (2010). Diffusion of web supported instruction in higher education-the case of Tel-Aviv university. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 212–223.

Spiering, K., & Erickson, S. (2006). Study abroad as innovation: Applying the diffusion model to international education. International Education Journal, 7(3), 314–322.

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.

Stake, R.E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). SAGE Publications.

Sun, Y., Guo, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Understanding the determinants of learner engagement in MOOCs: An adaptive structuration perspective. Computers & Education, 157, 103963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103963

Taylor, M.J., McNicholas, C., Nicolay, C., Darzi, A., Bell, D., & Reed, J.E. (2014). Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(4), 290–298.

Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial universities: Socio-economic impacts of academic entrepreneurship in a European region. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(1), 40–55.

Warford, M.K. (2005). Testing a diffusion of innovations in education model (DIEM). The Innovation Journal, 10(3), 1–28.

Xu, J., & Pimtong, T. (2021). Understanding student choice from an innovative knowledge-based student profiling perspective: An application of branding theory. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 23(5), 1325–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2021.1971138

Yakur, A., Musyarofah, L., Sulistiyaningsih, S., & Wike, W. (2020). The effect of project-based learning (PjBL) continuing learning innovation on learning outcomes of English in higher education. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 625–630.

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yokakul, N., & Zawdie, G. (2009). The role of triple helix for promoting social capital, industrial technology and innovation in the SME sector in Thailand. Science, Technology and Society, 14(1), 93–117.

Young, H., Coleman, B., Jagger, C., Moore, P.S., & Bunch, J.C. (2021). Exploring the preferred learning style of preservice teachers and how this influences their philosophy of teaching. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 2(2), 97–109. https://agdevresearch.org/index.php/aad/article/view/131/87

Yusof, M., & Jain, K.K. (2010). Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: A literature survey. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(1), 81–96.


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy